Global gold ETFs lost 84.7 t (-US$4.6 billion, -2% AUM) in February, marking outflows for the third time in 4 months, and the seventh worst historical monthly holdings loss. Global assets under management (AUM) now stand at 3681 t (US$207 billion), levels last seen in June 2020, when the price of gold was near the February closing level of US$1743/oz, according to the World Gold Council.
At a regional level, outflows were mostly driven by North American funds -71.2 t (US$4.1 billion, -3.4%), mainly from the largest funds, in contrast with low-cost gold ETFs which experienced net inflows – perhaps suggesting increased strategic buying amid momentum selling. European funds saw outflows of -23.8 t (US$1.1 billion, -1.1%), mainly from UK funds. Funds in other regions had minor outflows of -0.3 t (US$27 million, -0.7%). The one bright spot was Asia, with significant inflows of 10.6 t (US$596 million, +8.4%), primarily directed to Chinese- and Indian-listed funds. In China, investors used the gold pullback, as well as the first market pullback in the CSI 300 since September, to add to ETF holdings. Also, the price discount in China turned positive in the first 2 months of the year, highlighting increased demand.
Price performance and trading volumes
Gold in US dollar terms had its largest monthly decline in 4 years (-6.5%), finishing at US$1743/oz. From a performance perspective, this is an unusual start to the year. Over the past two decades, January/February has typically been the strongest 2 month period during the year. There is similar seasonality in gold ETF flows; they generally see their strongest inflows during the first quarter of the year.
Trading volumes for gold fell 12% during February to US$166 billion per day, below the 2020 average of US$183 billion. This was driven primarily by a 30% decrease in COMEX futures trading. Net long positioning, via the recent Commitment of Traders (COT) report for gold COMEX futures, fell to 675 t, below the 2020 average net long level of 871 t and the lowest level since June 2019.
Rates are impacting gold prices
Over the past year or so, the World Gold Council has highlighted that lower interest rates resulted in a reduction in the opportunity cost of holding gold. Conversely, as rates move higher, the yields on bonds become more attractive creating a headwind for the price of gold. This has been the case in recent months as discussed in a recent blog, gold is moving with rates. Its short-term gold performance model validates this perspective. Gold’s sensitivity to interest rates has increased by more than four-fold during the past year, and the movement in interest rates alone explains up to 40% of gold’s performance over the same period.
However, despite their significant relative increase, the overall level of nominal interest rates remains historically low and real rates across developed markets remain negative. World Gold Council’s analysis shows that gold can still perform well when interest rates are below 2% in real terms, well below their current level.
Inflation expectations and ‘reflation’ positioning are coming to the forefront
While higher nominal rates could create headwinds for gold, higher inflation may partly offset their effect. As COVID-19 vaccines roll out and monetary and fiscal stimulus continues, the Gold Council believes the continued rise in risk assets is partly driven by an expectation from investors that central banks and governments will continue to support global markets. As risk assets continue to climb, it is likely that investors are moving away from hedges and diversifiers such as bonds and gold in search of assets that may benefit from a higher correlation to equity markets.
However, inflation expectations appear to be rising and a commodity-led ‘reflation’ appears to have begun. Broad-based commodities have shown strength, which often occurs as markets enter inflationary periods. On the year, oil is up by more than 25% and copper up 17%. Lumber prices have more than doubled in the past 4 months, suggesting investors are anticipating a ‘reflation’ of assets. Inflation measures like the Consumer Price Index are expected to climb meaningfully in the coming months. Part of this is a function of oil prices increasing so strongly from last year’s levels, but also other metrics are flashing signs of inflation. Recently, the Treasury/TIPS breakeven levels, a metric that measures the difference between bonds and inflation-linked bonds, reached 2.4%, a level last seen 10 years ago.
Gold has so far lagged the commodities rally. However, this is not uncommon. Historically, gold has tended to underperform a commodity-led reflationary period in the first 6 months but has generally outperformed in the subsequent 6 to 36 months. This is because commodities are more closely linked to consumer baskets and, as they rise, feed inflation higher. Once expectations increase, investors often look for hedges to protect against the potential higher inflation which has historically benefited gold.
Monetary policy is poised to remain accommodative
Central bankers across the globe continue to suggest they will do what is needed to support the economy and keep policy rates low for the foreseeable future. On 1 March 2021, Australia doubled its bond purchases to spur the recent rise in yields, and focus remains on the European Central Bank, who has said would avoid any undue rise in yields. The Reserve Bank of India recently decided to continue the accommodative stance ‘as long as necessary’. US Federal Reserve Chairman, Jerome Powell, has indicated that interest rates in the US would be kept low to provide continued support for an economic recovery even as inflation ticks higher and the economy improves.
- Momentum trading impacted larger funds in North America – North American funds had outflows of 71.2 t (-US$4.1 billion, -3.4% AUM).
- Holdings in European funds fell by 23.8 t (-US$1.1 billion, -1.1%).
- Funds listed in Asia had strong net inflows of 10.6 t (US$596 million, +8.4%).
- Other regions had outflows of 0.3 t (-US$27.0 million, -0.7%).
- In North America, SPDR® Gold Shares lost 66.6 t (-US$3.8 billion, -5.5%), followed by iShares Gold Trust, which lost 7.2 t (-US$406 million, -1.3%). SPDR Gold MiniShares had holdings rise by 2.3 t (US$138 million, 3.3%) while Graniteshares Gold Trust added 0.4 t (US$22 million, 2%).
- In Europe, three UK-listed funds led outflows. Invesco Physical Gold lost 8.6 t (-US$498 million, -3.5%), iShares Physical Gold lost 5.2 t (-US$290 million, -2%), and Gold Bullion Securities lost 2.7 t (-US$157 million, -3.5%).
- In Asia, Huaan Yifu led global inflows of 4.8 t (US$278 million, 18%), while Bosera Gold added 2.2 t (US$128 million, 11%). Nippon India ETF grew holdings by 4.2%.
- Global AUM has retraced the last 6 months of overall inflows over the past 4 months.
- M/m swings in overall global flows continue to be dominated by US and UK funds.
- While larger gold ETFs have lost assets in recent months, likely from momentum trading, low-cost gold-backed ETFs continue to see assets grow.
- Asian gold ETFs holdings continue to grow assets despite other regions faltering.
Read the article online at: https://www.globalminingreview.com/special-reports/08032021/gold-etfs-losr-2-of-holdings-in-february/